Wednesday 15 April 2015

I am a Feminist... (I think)

So for a long time now, and particularly since Emma Watson (one of my idols and girl-crush haha) began to speak out with her HeforShe campaign and made a lasting impression with her UN speech, I have been thinking about the concept of feminism. I took History as a subject up until this year and looked at the famous women's rights movements of the past, such as the Suffragettes and Suffragists. I am currently a Modern Studies students and I often come across theories such as the Glass Ceiling Theory, which suggests that women can only progress so far in our current society and shocking statistics which also indicate this and other instances of gender discrimination in the current day and age. And I am soon to become an International Relations student and I know that gender equality has yet to become a given in many many places across the world.

A couple of days ago, one of these quiz things popped up on my Facebook called 'Are you a Feminist', and so I decided to take it. To my surprise, there was just one question, to which I answered 'yes of course', and my results were calculated as follows:



What I was asked was if I believe that all genders should share the same social, political and economic rights and, to me, that's not a question. If this is the true and original definition of feminism (which with some research I have determined that it is) then I am a feminist. Full stop.

However, although I am deeply saddened to know that there are a very small minority who would answer no to this, who honestly believe that one gender or another is superior, I know that the real debate over feminism is not a result of people disagreeing with equality, but disagreeing with the notion of feminism itself. Feminism appears to have acquired some negative connotations over time and it is this that plants doubt in the minds of people who would otherwise be proud to declare themselves feminists.

This morning, when I clicked onto Facebook, out of pure coincidence a chat had begun on a group I'm in about whether people were feminists, and their views on feminism. Instinctively, I wrote the following comment without dwelling too much over it, and it was this and the extremely interesting discussion which followed which prompted me to finally write this post, because I knew that my views on the subject were clearer than they'd previously been:



Emma Watson made it pretty clear in her speech that, while her HeforShe campaign is targeted at getting men especially on board, that is only because women are statistically proven to be more likely to be gender discriminated and not because we are under any delusion than men do not experience various types of gender discrimination too.

Many of the extremist 'feminist' cases in the media depict women "man-hating", refusing to listen to other points of view, or being deliberately rude or rebellious in order to gain publicity. It is sad that people need to do this, but as was pointed out to me, extreme action was required in the past by the likes of the Suffragettes in order to achieve many rights including that of the vote. So perhaps strong movements still have a place in today's society, but discrimination by one gender of the opposite gender because they feel it's a sort of "payback" for the discrimination they have received, is like trying to fix a wrong with a wrong. It is my belief that only a small number of 'feminists' use the term to associate with such actions, but that it is this small number who have given the entire movement a bad name.

Within the previously mentioned discussion, a number of interesting points were raised. One person held the belief that feminism comes hand in hand with being a woman. In light of the hardships faced by women across the world I understand where this person was coming from, however I believe gender equality to be just as much the business of men as it is of women. A forward-moving, healthy society can only, in my opinion, be achieved as a result of equality, and cooperation in achieving this equality, between sexes, and such a society would be beneficial to everyone. Furthermore, while it may not be as glaringly obvious, men are victims of gender discrimination too; ever thought about how having to maintain masculinity or have a manly occupation, dress sense, favourite drink, etc. might be a stereotype which verges on discrimination? This is just the example which comes to mind immediately.

Another point which was raised A LOT, was people saying that they agreed with gender equality, but would not refer to themselves as a feminist due to the negative connotations and fear of being misinterpreted. I can completely relate to this point. It's the reason for that hint of doubt in brackets which features in the title of this post. I mean, in the end, as long as we are all in agreement of what needs to happen and willing to do something about it, then what's the value of a name? We can call it anything we like so long as it's positive! And we may as well steer clear of a term the media and a few people have tarred with one brush and move into the modern-day with a new, innovative movement. I get it. People don't want to have to explain every time they identify as a feminist about how that doesn't mean they hate men, or care less about men's rights. Because, let's be realistic, that's what we have to do and there is absolutely no reason why we should be defending ourselves.

However (I'm almost done, promise! ;) ) part of me sees the flipside. If we change the name, who's to say that there won't be a minority of people masquerading under that term who don't respect its definition. Why should/would we abandon a term that's got so much history and has got us so far? Therefore, it really is my belief that rather than arguing over the name, we should all come together and tell the world what it truly is to be a feminist/equalist//liberal feminist/decent human being...

In short: I am a Feminist. And proud.



I would love to know your views on feminism in the comments- I honestly love polite, respectful debate so don't worry if you disagree with me! I know this post was a bit different to usual, but I thought I'd test it out, so I would really love feedback on if you enjoy this type of post and, if so, what other topics you'd like to see me cover. Thanks for all your support xx

Friday 10 April 2015

Film Review: 'Love, Rosie'

When my friend and I went to see 'If I stay' at the cinema last year we saw a trailer for 'Love, Rosie' starring Lily Collins and Sam Claflin and based on the novel 'Where Rainbows End', which I haven't read but would like too. We turned to each other, and without speaking (we were in the cinema after all, but maybe we did whisper a little) we knew that it was our kind of film. But when it finally came out in the cinema, we never managed to arrange a time when we were both free to see it.

It was my sister's birthday 2 weeks ago and her friend bought her 'Love Rosie' on DVD. So, on Sunday night my sister and I stocked up on Easter egg chocolate and watched it.

Brief Summary: Rosie and Alex are best friends from a very young age. As they grow up, Rosie is a party-girl, popular with the boys, while Alex is smart (...and very handsome!) Alex receives a scholarship for Harvard University and wants Rosie to go with him, but she finds out she's pregnant and lies to her friend to save embarrassment. But sometimes who and what you need is closer than you think...  

In the opening 10-20 minutes of the film, my sister found me really annoying because I kept making comments about how unrealistic it was. I mean, it wasn't so much the plot, because yes parts of that were unrealistic but you kind of have to accept that in films! It was more than, for me, the acting and direction portrayed in the opening  of the film didn't convince me that it could be real. There were several sequences in the film where I kept thinking it was going to be one of those "and then she woke up and it was all a dream" moments. After a while she basically told me to shut up, and I did enjoy the rest of the film, but the  comments about the stupidity of these elements was eating me up inside!

That said, I really like both Collins and Claflin and found them a good pair, who were amusing too! After watching, I had this kind of appreciation for opportunities in life: for love, for travel, for education, for friends, for family, for choices. I know that sounds pretty deep but it just reminded me that sometimes things don't go as planned but it doesn't mean you don't get something good out of it too!

Overall, this film was a wee bit disappointing for me because it was very different to what I was expecting and I'd been waiting so long to see it that I think I made I made it more impressive in my head! But it's watchable and worth it if you're looking for something light-hearted!

Friday 3 April 2015

Book Review: 'Girl Online' by Zoe Sugg (a.k.a Zoella)

I read this book, which I bought months ago on my Kindle, in little snippets of time I found throughout last week, and then in one particularly long reading session last Friday night!

I heard about this book because I enjoy watching YouTube, and while I've only watched a handful of Zoella's actual videos, the Youtubers I do follow on Social Networking lead me to this relatively recent book! Around the time of its publication, there was a lot of talk about how it had been 'Ghost Written' meaning that Zoe had considerable help in writing it, so much so that there are many parts she didn't write. Whether, or to what extent, that is true never really fussed me. I mean, she was a first-time author and obviously the name of a famous YouTuber is going to sell more copies than any other name. She's still an incredibly talented woman who has worked her butt off to put together a novel and get a publishing contract. Who are we, as unpublished people, to criticise? Its not like she didn't acknowledge her supporters at the back of the book.

Anyway, back to the novel itself. Brief Summary: Socially Awkward Penny suffers from anxiety, but when she and her family end up taking a last minute New York trip with her parents' company for Christmas and New Year, she meets Noah and he just seems perfect. How will the pair's feeling develops, and what are the consequences of distance and secrets?

Pictured: Author & Youtuber Zoe Sugg (plus 'Girl Online' cover)
Ok, so that brief summary turned into more of my own blurb for the book haha, but you get the drift.

I really enjoyed the book as a light-read, and thought that the fact that it dealt with anxiety, panic attacks and techniques for dealing with these things was very useful. I was also fairly glued to the book because I'm a hopeless romantic and it was perfectly soppy ;)

However, unfortunately I did predict some of the key 'shocking twists' very early on, and therefore found it to be quite a predictable read. My friend had told me before-hand that it was quite unrealistic, and I would definitely agree with this, but hey, a girl can dream right?
 Wouldn't we all love the man of our dreams in New York and for our wee blog to be a massive hit that got 300 comments and went viral? Haha xx

Overall, definitely worth it as a fun read with cute and quirky characters, particular Penny and her best friend Elliot, and good on Zoella for powering through the initial criticism, but maybe not a particularly high-level novel